If it can't run on the metal, is it really an OS that's "native"? Surely an "AI-native" OS runs the AI in ring zero? Is a dockerfile the same as an OS? Always?
These are serious questions, about what is surely not a serious project.
amelius 30 minutes ago [-]
This website seems broken in multiple ways. Is the author trying to make a point?
madrox 11 minutes ago [-]
I don't think this was author-submitted. The last github commit was 10 months ago. It's ancient by AI standards.
Falimonda 25 minutes ago [-]
SlopOS
ToucanLoucan 23 minutes ago [-]
I think it's parody? That said all products made with heavy AI use are so inherently bad, and the buffoons so credulous behind their prompts, that it's difficult to suss out genuine efforts by unqualified people vs. people who know it's bad and are doing it to be funny/make that point.
It's kinda like trying to identify actual crypto projects headed by people who have no idea how anything outside cryptographic programming works, versus ones headed by people who know exactly how stupid it is and are just looking to cash a check.
Also the people who hype AI and the ones who backed crypto are basically the same exact circle of bag holders. They'll be out of AI as soon as the bubble pops. I think robotics is gonna be the next one.
pbw 39 minutes ago [-]
This will happen for real. But then a JIT-like process will generate regular code for efficiency, on the fly in the background.
cassianoleal 8 minutes ago [-]
> But what about privacy?
> "I will not run AI with access to my hardware!"
> Sure! That's why we have a Dockerized version
Is this serious? Have I missed the point of the satire?
rvz 20 minutes ago [-]
We are going to see more of these vibe-coded abandoned projects floating around GitHub. Last commit was 10 months ago. [0]
This gives me that same feeling as 90s-00s Linux .... Sure, your gonna royal mess it all up at some point and have to reinstall (probably sooner than you think)....but look at all the fun stuff you can potentially do with it.
Rendered at 23:05:55 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
These are serious questions, about what is surely not a serious project.
It's kinda like trying to identify actual crypto projects headed by people who have no idea how anything outside cryptographic programming works, versus ones headed by people who know exactly how stupid it is and are just looking to cash a check.
Also the people who hype AI and the ones who backed crypto are basically the same exact circle of bag holders. They'll be out of AI as soon as the bubble pops. I think robotics is gonna be the next one.
> "I will not run AI with access to my hardware!"
> Sure! That's why we have a Dockerized version
Is this serious? Have I missed the point of the satire?
[0] https://github.com/caffeinum/vibeOS