> the sports entertainment company moved 12,000 virtual machines (VMs)
So, for each top golf location we have something like 120 VMs? That sounds suspiciously like exactly one per bay.
After a point it must be cheaper to bring in a AAA engineer and do this with 10-50x fewer machines. Poking VMs with the management stick doesn't fundamentally solve this IT scaling problem.
dcrazy 9 days ago [-]
Given their proximity to chunks steel being flung around by newbies, I suspect the VM-per-bay solution is part of a thin client deployment that makes the customer-facing hardware as cheap and efficient to replace as possible.
accrual 7 days ago [-]
Nice inference, it sounds like a naturally grown solution. Make an app that controls one golf location or terminal. Grow for X years. One VM + App per terminal. Now there's 100+ VMs per site, multiply by site count, plus admin. No terminal-level refactor that would reduce costs and admin.
486sx33 10 days ago [-]
[dead]
accrual 10 days ago [-]
Always enjoy reading a post-Broadcom migration story, congrats to Topgolf for making the move.
dcrazy 10 days ago [-]
Unfortunately it’s a drop in the bucket compared to how much they’re losing on the actual business.
accrual 7 days ago [-]
Are there numbers regarding Broadcom losses since implementing their "fuck you" policies? I would love to see them, because they are wringing an entire industry dry for a few drops of short term gains.
Rendered at 00:11:44 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
So, for each top golf location we have something like 120 VMs? That sounds suspiciously like exactly one per bay.
After a point it must be cheaper to bring in a AAA engineer and do this with 10-50x fewer machines. Poking VMs with the management stick doesn't fundamentally solve this IT scaling problem.